Independent comparisonAll prices in GBPPrices checked

Framer vs Webflow: UK Pricing and Verdict (2026)

Framer is one design tool priced per site plus per editor on a sterling rate card, with custom code but no export. Webflow bills per site in US dollars, puts its CMS a rung above the entry plan, sells editor seats on separate Workspace plans and lets you export the code.

Independent comparison by SMECompare. How we compare

Framer logo

Framer at a glance

Framer is a design tool that publishes websites. Its AI generates and edits inside the tool and it imports Figma files. It publishes a sterling rate card, bills month to month with no contract, prices each site as its own plan and charges for every editor beyond the owner up to a hard ceiling. The free plan cannot take a custom domain, the CMS is a collections feature, selling runs through integrations and there is no code export, though custom code is accepted.

Webflow logo

Webflow at a glance

Webflow is a visual designer with Webflow AI generating and editing inside it and a Figma import. It bills in US dollars per site, so the pound figure in the table is a conversion at a recorded rate, with no contract on monthly billing. The free plan sits on a Webflow subdomain with a page cap and no custom domain. Webflow's own plans page puts the CMS one rung above the entry site plan, sells through separate Ecommerce site plans and puts editor seats on Workspace plans. The code can be exported.

Own domain
Sell online?
2 ProvidersFramer logoFramerWebflow logoWebflow
Est. Cost /mo (GBP)£10/moCheapest£19/mo
Plans & Pricing
£10/mo (Basic)£19/mo (Basic)
True monthlyTrue monthly
Yes, but no custom domainYes, Starter plan on a webflow.io subdomain, 2 pages, no custom domain
NoneNone on monthly
AI Capability
AI assists generation and editing within a design toolWebflow AI generates and edits a site within a visual designer
Proprietary (Framer AI)Proprietary (Webflow AI)
No, fixed AINo, fixed AI
500/mo (Free), 1,000 (Basic), 3,000 (Pro)Not published as a number
Flat plan price plus per-editor chargeFlat plan price per site
Sites & Publishing
1 per project plan1 per site plan
Basic and aboveBasic plan and above
Via integrationsVia Ecommerce site plans
No, CMS collections (no app backend)No, CMS and memberships (Webflow Cloud hosts custom apps separately)
Owner free, then £15 per editor, hard ceiling of 10Via Workspace plans
50GB bandwidth (Basic)1GB bandwidth (Starter), 10GB (Basic), 50GB and up (Premium)
Features & Support
Large marketplace, design-ledLarge marketplace, design-led
Figma importFigma import
Stripe, embeds, APIsApp marketplace, MCP server, APIs, Stripe
YesYes, on a paid site plan
No, but supports custom codeYes, code export
Email and communitySupport portal, priority on higher plans
Yes, genuine GBP rate cardNo, US dollars only
Estimates based on 1 website and 1 user, with your own domain. Rates can change without notice, confirm current pricing with the provider before signing on.
How we calculate this
  • Estimated cost: each provider’s published prices and rates applied to the inputs you set above (such as volume, team size, or invoices), plus any fixed monthly fees.
  • Providers with an incomplete cost and quote-only providers are never ranked as the cheapest while a complete-cost option exists.
  • These are estimates. Published rates can change and your final pricing depends on your business, so confirm current pricing with the provider before switching.

Framer vs Webflow: which suits a UK business, designer or agency?

Choose Framer for a design-led marketing site built in one tool, priced in pounds, that will stay where you build it. Choose Webflow if the site needs a CMS and memberships behind the pages, an app marketplace, or the option to export the code and host it yourself, and you are content to pay in US dollars per site.

Both offer a free plan without a custom domain and both import Figma files. What separates them is what each charges you for: Framer for every editor beyond the owner, Webflow for the CMS rung and for Workspace seats outside the site plan. The full table and our buyer's guide are on the AI website builders hub.

Plans and pricing checked October 2026, and every figure below is read live from our pricing database and checked against each vendor's own pricing page, the same data as the table and calculator above. The table and calculator rank on published prices only. We may earn a commission if you buy through our links; it never changes the order.

Framer vs Webflow pricing: pounds against dollars, editors against Workspaces

Framer's entry plan is £10/mo (Basic), on a sterling rate card (local pricing: Yes, genuine GBP rate card) with nothing to sign (contract: None). Each website is its own plan, and editors are charged on top: the Team members row reads Owner free, then £15 per editor, hard ceiling of 10. A sole trader pays the plan price alone; a studio pays a seat per person, up to the ceiling.

Webflow's entry plan shows as £19/mo (Basic), but Webflow bills in US dollars (local pricing: No, US dollars only), so the pound figure is a conversion at a recorded exchange rate. It is a flat price per site (pricing model: Flat plan price per site; contract: None on monthly). Editors are bought elsewhere (Team members: Via Workspace plans): Workspace plans are a separate Webflow subscription, so the table prices Webflow's site plan only.

Sites per plan are 1 per project plan on Framer and 1 per site plan on Webflow, and both bill month to month, so the table shows a rolling monthly figure for each.

In the calculator above, Websites multiplies both estimates, because each site is a separate plan on either. Users moves Framer's estimate only, because Webflow's seats live outside the site plan. Set Users to everyone who will log in, including anyone outside the business.

Who is each one built for

Framer started as a design tool and remains one: its AI row reads AI assists generation and editing within a design tool, and the published site is the design you made. It suits anyone who would rather work on a canvas than in a page builder, with Figma import (Figma import) to begin from an existing design and a template marketplace (Large marketplace, design-led) when there is none.

Webflow is a visual designer with a publishing platform behind it. Its AI row reads Webflow AI generates and edits a site within a visual designer. It too imports Figma (Figma import) and its templates row reads Large marketplace, design-led, so the design side is close. The difference lies behind the pages: a CMS, memberships, an app marketplace and a connector that lets AI assistants read and edit the site (Webflow calls it an MCP server). That points it at an agency, or a business whose site is content rather than a brochure.

The AI is proprietary on each (Proprietary (Framer AI) and Proprietary (Webflow AI)) and neither lets you bring your own. If your deciding question is which you will find easier, both have a free plan, and an afternoon on each answers it better than any table.

CMS and content: collections against a CMS on a higher plan

Framer's Backend row reads No, CMS collections (no app backend): structured content for blog posts, case studies or listings, inside the design tool, with no application backend. Webflow's reads No, CMS and memberships (Webflow Cloud hosts custom apps separately), and Webflow's own plans page puts the CMS one rung above the entry site plan. A Webflow site with a blog or listings is therefore priced from that rung. The calculator cannot see that, because it costs by sites and users, so read the Backend row before relying on the entry figure.

Neither is an app builder. A booking system or a members' area with its own data belongs to the other half of this market (see Lovable vs Base44), and Webflow's own answer is a separate product, Webflow Cloud.

Selling online

Framer sells through integrations (Online store: Via integrations; Integrations: Stripe, embeds, APIs), so the shop's cost sits outside the plan price. Webflow sells through its Ecommerce site plans (Online store: Via Ecommerce site plans; Integrations: App marketplace, MCP server, APIs, Stripe), which are not the plans priced here, so the table covers a non-selling site on both. A service business that invoices after the work needs neither; a retailer should ask each vendor for its selling plan first.

AI limits, bandwidth and support

  • AI usage limits: Framer 500/mo (Free), 1,000 (Basic), 3,000 (Pro), Webflow Not published as a number
  • Storage: Framer 50GB bandwidth (Basic), Webflow 1GB bandwidth (Starter), 10GB (Basic), 50GB and up (Premium)
  • Hosting included: Framer Yes, Webflow Yes, on a paid site plan
  • Support: Framer Email and community, Webflow Support portal, priority on higher plans

Framer publishes its AI allowance as a number per plan, so you can budget against it. Webflow does not, so ask what fair use means before you depend on Webflow AI. Both publish storage as bandwidth, which your visitors spend rather than you. Webflow's support adds priority on higher plans, which matters more to a shop window than to a portfolio.

Export and lock-in

Framer does not export code (No, but supports custom code): you keep the domain and can add custom code inside the site, but leaving means rebuilding. Webflow does (Yes, code export), which hands you the hosting and buys you the option of leaving. For a brochure site either is fine. If the site is the business, or a client may bring it in house, the Export row matters more than the entry price.

Considerations for a UK business

Pounds against dollars. Framer's price is the price that reaches your card (local pricing: Yes, genuine GBP rate card). Webflow's pound figure is a conversion (local pricing: No, US dollars only): what is charged drifts with the exchange rate even when Webflow's US dollar price does not move, and many UK cards add a non-sterling transaction fee that shows on your bank statement and never on the vendor's invoice. If you are VAT registered, software from an overseas supplier is usually handled under the reverse charge, so the ex-VAT figure is closer to your real cost; below the threshold you pay the inclusive figure.

Cookie consent and PECR. A UK site needs consent before it sets non-essential cookies, analytics included, and a banner whose only button is Accept is not consent. Neither builder is listed here with consent tooling, so test it on a trial site: is analytics held back until someone clicks Accept, and is Reject on the first screen? If you need a consent platform, Framer's custom code is the route for the script; on Webflow, confirm the same on your plan first.

Enquiry forms and UK GDPR. Neither builder has an app backend, so a form submission sits with the builder, an inbox or a form service, and whichever holds it is a processor to name in your privacy notice. Collect a newsletter opt-in as its own separate choice, never as a side effect of a contact form.

Your .co.uk. A site on a vendor subdomain is not a business website, so the free plans are for trialling. Keep the domain at your own registrar and it moves with you if the site does not.

The verdict

Framer is the pick for a designer, a studio or a small UK business that wants a design-led marketing site from one tool, priced in pounds, and does not expect to move it. Budget a seat for each person who edits, and nothing else beyond the plan. Webflow is the pick for an agency, or a business whose site is content and integrations. It wants a CMS behind the pages and the option to export the code one day, and it is content to pay in US dollars per site with editor seats on top. Set Websites and Users to your real numbers in the calculator, then read the Backend and Export rows. If a team will run this site and might want to bring it in house, that decides it before the entry price does.

Ratings

Framer logoFramerWebflow logoWebflow
What stands outSterling rate card, month to month, Figma import, custom code and AI limits published per plan, but every editor beyond the owner is a paid seat with a hard ceiling, selling runs through integrations and there is no code export.Figma import, a CMS and memberships, an app marketplace and code export, but billed in US dollars per site, the CMS sits a rung above the entry plan, editor seats live on separate Workspace plans and the AI allowance is not published as a number.

The user rating is the average from verified reviews on the named external source.

Frequently asked questions

Where do these prices come from?

They are read live from our pricing database, and the same figures drive the table and calculator above. We check each one against the vendor's own pricing page. Framer publishes a sterling rate card, so its figure is the one on its site. Webflow bills in US dollars, so its pound figure is a conversion at a recorded exchange rate, and the sum on your card will move with the rate. We may earn a commission if you buy through our links; that never changes the order of the table.

Is Framer cheaper than Webflow?

Both price per site, so the answer rests on how many people edit the site and on the exchange rate. Framer bills in pounds month to month and adds a paid seat for each editor beyond the owner, up to a hard ceiling, so a sole trader and a studio pay different sums. Webflow bills in US dollars per site, so what reaches your card moves with the rate, and its editor seats are a separate Workspace subscription outside the site plan. Set Websites and Users to your real numbers in the calculator above; Users moves Framer's estimate only.

Can you export a Framer site?

No. Framer offers no code export, so a Framer site stays hosted on Framer. It does accept custom code inside the site, which covers scripts, embeds, a consent banner and small fixes, and your domain comes with you if you leave, but the pages would have to be rebuilt elsewhere. Webflow is the opposite: it offers code export, so you can take the generated code and host it yourself if you outgrow the platform. If leaving with the build matters to your business, that row settles the comparison before price does.

Do Framer and Webflow have free plans?

Yes, both do, and neither free plan lets you connect your own domain. Framer's free plan publishes a site but needs a paid plan before a custom domain can be attached. Webflow's free plan publishes on a Webflow subdomain with a cap on pages and no custom domain. A site on a vendor subdomain is not a business website for a UK company, so treat both as a trial of the tool, and compare the entry paid plans in the table, which is where a custom domain begins on both.

Does Framer have a CMS like Webflow?

Framer has CMS collections, which hold structured content such as blog posts or case studies inside the design tool. Webflow has the Webflow CMS plus memberships, and its plans page puts the CMS one rung above the entry site plan, so a Webflow site with a blog or listings is priced from that rung. Neither gives you an application backend with a database and server code of your own: Webflow hosts custom applications on a separate product called Webflow Cloud, and Framer has no app backend at all. A client portal with its own data needs the other half of this market.

How does SMECompare compare Framer and Webflow?

We are independent and not owned by any provider. The comparison table above pulls live pricing from our database, last checked 4 October 2026, and the calculator estimates each option at your own numbers. Our editorial verdict weighs price, features and UK fit, not commercial relationships. See How we compare for our full method.

Keep comparing

Related comparisons

Browse all versus comparisons